Committee publication · Correspondence · 21 April 2026
Letter from Professor Helen Wood, Professor of Media and Cultural Studies and Principal Investigator at ReCARETV, regarding concerns about reality television, 8 April 2026
Summary
Professor Helen Wood and the ReCARETV research team report that despite Ofcom's 2021 Broadcasting Code changes, reality television participants continue experiencing serious harms including mental health crises, sexual assault allegations, and bullying. Their three-year AHRC-funded study of 119 interviews found one-third of participants reported serious harm post-2021. They highlight ineffective complaint mechanisms and request the committee review duty-of-care protections in unscripted production.
Key findings
- One-third of reality TV participants interviewed reported experiences consistent with serious harm, including suicidal ideation, PTSD, sexual assault allegations, and racism, despite Ofcom's 2021 Broadcasting Code updates
- High-risk formats based on emotional intensity, conflict, isolation from family, and low participant autonomy create conditions for trauma
- Ofcom's post-broadcast complaint mechanism is ineffective: many participants unaware of it, serious complaints marked 'not entertained' without published statistics, and the process risks re-traumatising complainants
- Television production crew face worsening conditions, job insecurity, poor mental health, and pressure to participate in morally compromising situations
- Confidentiality clauses in participant contracts deter victims from sharing experiences, limiting visibility of actual harm scope
Tone
CriticalTopics
Key actors
Professor Helen Wood, Dr Jilly Kay, Dr Jack Newsinger, Dr Mhairi Brennan, Ofcom, Caroline Dinenage, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee
Notable line
“… experiences, with a third presenting experiences that might be considered to include serious harm. Examples include: • Mental health impacts of trauma e.g.”
Key Quotes
“Our research has found that this is a mixed picture and whilst there is considerable evidence of good practice, half of our interviews and questionnaire sample after the code change report having negative experiences, with a third presenting experiences that might be considered to include serious harm.”
“The most serious issues reported to us were associated with certain "high risk" shows where formats are based upon emotional intensity and conflict, in which participants are cut off from friends and family, and have the least control over their experiences.”
“Many participants did not know that they can complain to Ofcom, but in our data, there are examples where participants tell us of serious complaints being made that are "not entertained".”
“Having complained to production companies, the broadcaster, and then to Ofcom this outcome can be re- traumatising.”
“We are concerned whether it is possible that a production can be found to be compliant with the code and yet serious foreseen harms can still occur.”
Source · parliament.uk record ↗